The iframe on this page is empty and contains no contentSkip to content

Research Assessment Exercise

Imperial College London RAE08 results

The results achieved by Imperial in the 2008 RAE for each unit of assessment that the College submitted to are given below.

For analysis of Imperial's overall results and of each unit of assessment the College submitted to, staff and students should visit the analysis section (internal only).

UoA UoA Description
(links to further analysis are internal only)
Cat A FTE Overall quality profile (percentage of research activity at each quality level)
Data definitions
4* 3* 2* 1* u/c
01 Cardiovascular Medicine 64.27 20 45 30 5 0
02 Cancer Studies 51.55 15 60 20 5 0
03 Infection and Immunology 102.40 30 40 25 5 0
04 Other Hospital Based Clinical Subjects 174.10 30 45 20 5 0
06 Epidemiology and Public Health 32.95 40 30 30 0 0
09 Psychiatry, Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology 55.10 10 50 30 10 0
14 Biological Sciences 92.30 20 45 25 10 0
18 Chemistry 53.10 20 55 25 0 0
19 Physics 126.80 20 45 25 10 0
20 Pure Mathematics 21.80 40 45 15 0 0
21 Applied Mathematics 37.20 20 45 35 0 0
22 Statistics and Operational Research 13.90 25 50 25 0 0
23 Computer Science and Informatics 53.40 35 50 15 0 0
24 Electrical and Electronic Engineering 44.00 20 55 20 5 0
25A General Engineering: Bioengineering 22.80 25 50 20 5 0
25B General Engineering: Earth Science and Engineering 44.90 25 45 30 0 0
26 Chemical Engineering 38.00 30 55 15 0 0
27 Civil Engineering 49.40 40 55 5 0 0
28 Mechanical, Aeronautical and Manufacturing Engineering 67.00 30 50 15 5 0
29 Metallurgy and Materials 27.00 20 35 40 5 0
36 Business and Management Studies 47.60 35 50 15 0 0
62 History 5.00 40 40 20 0 0

Data definitions

 
Cat A Category A staff: Academic staff in post on 31 October 2007 who were selected for submission into the RAE
FTE Full Time Equivalent
4* Quality that is world-leading in terms of originality, significance and rigour
3* Quality that is internationally excellent in terms of originality, significance and rigour but which nonetheless falls short of the highest standards of excellence
2* Quality that is recognised internationally in terms of originality, significance and rigour
1* Quality that is recognised nationally in terms of originality, significance and rigour
Unclassified (u/c) Quality that falls below the standard of nationally recognised work. Or work which does not meet the published definition of research for the purposes of assessment